[PetiteCloud] Requirements for proposed new logging framework?

[Michael Thoreson]

The biggest advantage is obvious. TinyLog appears to have very little 
overhead and thus very little impact on host resources. It also looks 
like the output could also easily be piped through a ssh connection to a 
"syslog" server for added security and possible compression to lower 
bandwidth.

Michael Thoreson,

On 04/03/2014 5:10 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Note til we decide which "real" logger to go with Dee is doing a 
> sketch artist model of a very basic one so we can get back to our real 
> work which is PC
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Dee Nixon <dnixon-fnre at nyclocal.net 
> <mailto:dnixon-fnre at nyclocal.net>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks to John Kane and Michael Thoreson for your suggestion
>     regarding a logging framework.
>
>     I would be interested to hear your (and anyone else's thoughts about
>     how TinyLog compares with the Java library's logging framework:
>
>     http://www.tinylog.org/first-steps
>
>     http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/logging/package-summary.html
>     .
>
>     What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     petitecloud-general mailing list
>     petitecloud-general at lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net
>     <mailto:petitecloud-general at lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net>
>     http://lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net/listinfo.cgi/petitecloud-general-petitecloud.nyclocal.net
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> petitecloud-general mailing list
> petitecloud-general at lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net
> http://lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net/listinfo.cgi/petitecloud-general-petitecloud.nyclocal.net