[PetiteCloud] portsnap and svn

[Michael Thoreson]

No it isn't yet.

But I wanted to make sure that a ports update via either portsnap or 
svn(lite) didn't remove it from the local machine cause it wasn't part 
of the official port tree.

It was just a possible situation that could cause a glitch so i did a 
quick update using both methods to make sure it was removed or altered 
after the user manually put in locally as per the installation instructions.

Michael Thoreson,


On 13/02/2014 7:08 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> as in it is now a part of the official port tree?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Michael Thoreson 
> <m.thoreson at c4labs.ca <mailto:m.thoreson at c4labs.ca>> wrote:
>
>     Just did a test to see if portsnap or svn would try to remove
>     petitecloud from the local ports collection when running an update
>     and it appears that petitecloud is untouched.
>
>     Michael Thoreson,
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     petitecloud-general mailing list
>     petitecloud-general at lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net
>     <mailto:petitecloud-general at lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net>
>     http://lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net/listinfo.cgi/petitecloud-general-petitecloud.nyclocal.net
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> petitecloud-general mailing list
> petitecloud-general at lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net
> http://lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net/listinfo.cgi/petitecloud-general-petitecloud.nyclocal.net